§ Deepfake Exposure Self-Check·client-side form · no sign-up

How exposed are you to deepfake-enabled fraud?

Answer a few questions about your money-movement and identity-verification workflows and the controls around them, and get an exposure score plus the top process gaps a deepfake attacker would look for, framed as fixes you can act on.

This is a starting point to focus a conversation for a CISO, head of fraud, treasurer, or risk leader. It is not an audit, not a covert test of your staff, and not a guarantee against fraud. Your team owns the decisions it raises.

◆This runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent to a server.
§ Read this first

This self-check scores your exposure to deepfake-enabled fraud from the high-risk workflows you have and the verification controls around them, and returns an exposure band and the top process gaps to close. It is a starting point, not an audit, not a covert test of your staff, and not a guarantee against fraud. It maps to process controls (out-of-band verification, callback protocols, multi-person approval, awareness) that reduce exposure. Your team owns the decisions. No data leaves the browser.

§ The self-check·your workflows, then four control questions
WorkflowsWhich high-risk workflows exist at your organization?

Select all that apply. These are the money-movement and identity flows a deepfake or voice-clone attempt is built to exploit. This sets the surface an attacker has to work with.

Q1Is out-of-band verification required before money moves?

Confirming a high-value request through a separate, known channel (not by replying on the same call or thread) is the control a convincing deepfake cannot satisfy.

Q2Do callback protocols exist for payment and payee changes?

Calling back a pre-established contact on a known number before a bank-detail or payee change takes effect stops a spoofed or cloned request from redirecting funds.

Q3Does high-value approval require more than one person?

Multi-person approval above a defined threshold means no single approver can be talked into moving money alone, even by a convincing call or video.

Q4Have staff had awareness training on deepfake voice/video fraud?

People in money-movement roles need to know synthetic voice and video fraud is real, that pausing to verify an executive request is legitimate, and how to escalate a suspicious call without blame.

Select at least one workflow and answer all four control questions to get your exposure read.
·

Deepfake exposure: ·

Why this read

·

Control-by-control

Based on the workflows you selected and the controls around them. Each line is a heuristic, not an audit finding.

Top process gaps to close

The highest-leverage fixes for the gaps found, framed as process changes to make with your fraud, treasury, and security teams.

    § Turn this into a full readiness assessment·from a self-read to a board-ready report

    A self-check is a read from the inside. The value is a scoped assessment of your actual flows: an exposure map, a control-gap review, optional simulated scenarios, and a board-ready report your leadership can act on. That is the AI Deepfake / Social-Engineering Defense Readiness Assessment.

    § What to produce next

    ·

    § The fine print

    This self-check is a structured starting point to focus a conversation about deepfake-enabled fraud. It is not an audit, not a covert test of your staff, not ongoing detection or monitoring, and not a guarantee against fraud. The exposure bands and gap list are structured heuristics, not certifications or benchmarks. For ongoing detection tooling, DSE orchestrates a vetted MDR or tooling partner rather than running it itself.

    No data leaves the browser. Nothing you enter is sent to a server or retained.

    Copied to clipboard.

    Last reviewed: 2026-07-05 · Initial release. The workflow list, control mapping, exposure bands, and gap logic are a structured practitioner heuristic for deepfake-fraud readiness, re-checked quarterly. Accuracy is the point, and it is not a substitute for a scoped assessment.

    § When you want the full assessment·fixed-fee, senior-only

    Get a full deepfake defense readiness assessment.

    A self-check reads your own view from the inside. When you want the real picture, a principal maps your actual transaction flows and controls and hands you an exposure map, a control-gap report, and a board-ready plan.

    Deepfake Defense Readiness → Scope a call →
    § What this is·and what it isn't

    A self-assessment. Not a fraud guarantee.

    This self-check is a structured self-assessment to focus a conversation about deepfake-enabled fraud for a CISO, head of fraud, treasurer, or risk leader. It does not test your staff, does not access your systems, and does not provide legal or security advice. It reduces exposure by surfacing process control gaps; it cannot certify that your firm cannot be defrauded.

    DSE provides AI security and cyber-risk readiness work, including a fixed-scope deepfake and social-engineering defense readiness assessment. We do not run covert tests of your staff, do not run ongoing detection or monitoring ourselves (we orchestrate a vetted MDR or tooling partner for that), and do not guarantee any outcome. We work alongside your fraud, treasury, security, and counsel teams.