We reduce the chance of email fraud, ransomware, credential theft, vendor risk, and unsafe AI use, and we give leadership a clear plan to fix the gaps that matter most. Most security incidents at companies this size do not come from sophisticated attackers. They come from the basics being undone. We give you a clear, prioritized picture, the policies and baseline to close the gaps, and ongoing senior leadership to keep them closed. Federal-grade rigor, scaled to a growing company's budget and stage.
An executive without MFA, a backup nobody has tested, a contractor with standing access nobody revoked, an employee pasting client data into a public AI tool. This is the division built for the person who owns security risk, whether that is a dedicated security lead or CISO, or the COO, VP of Engineering, or owner carrying that load at a company without one. Growing and mid-market companies (roughly 50 to 500 employees) and funded startups, without a full internal security team and not ready to hire one, but past the point where "we'll deal with it later" is safe.
Your security posture mapped against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and CIS Controls, based on configuration review, interviews, and observable evidence. A ranked gap list: what is most likely to hurt you, and why.
MFA coverage and gaps, privileged and executive account protection, and account-takeover exposure across Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, with prioritized fixes.
Third-party tools, contractors, and OAuth-connected apps that touch your data, with the high-risk grants flagged for removal or tightening.
Backup coverage review plus a restore test or tabletop to confirm recovery actually works, and recommendations to reduce blast radius.
A focused read on where AI tools are creating data exposure, with rules anchored to the NIST AI RMF and OWASP LLM Top 10. The full version is the AI-path offer; here it is the security-lens summary.
Go deeper on the AI front door →Your next three security moves, plus a 90-day plan sequenced by risk and effort. The document leadership uses to decide where to spend, and it sets up the remediation sprint and the fractional engagement.
Delivered by a senior Solutions Architect whose security experience comes from regulated financial services and federal environments, where controls are not optional and an audit clock is always running. That background includes authority-to-operate (ATO) documentation under the NIST Risk Management Framework, CMMC-aware federal delivery, cloud security on AWS, and identity and access (IAM) and least-privilege architecture as a core discipline. On the AI side, it includes red-teaming of agentic workflows (prompt injection, tool abuse, data exfiltration) and governance under the NIST AI RMF. You are getting federal-grade security rigor and genuine AI-security depth, applied at a growing company's scale. Not a junior analyst with a template.
| Tier | Scope | Investment |
|---|---|---|
| Essentials | Single environment, team under ~75. All six deliverables, written readout. | $2,500 |
| Foundation | Up to ~250 employees. Adds deeper vendor and supply-chain review and a live leadership readout. | $3,750 |
| Foundation+ | Up to ~500 employees or a regulated environment. Adds a board-ready deck and a 30-day check-in. | $5,000 |
Priced as an approvable expense, not a procurement event.
This page is the security front door. If your week is mostly about employees pasting client data into public AI tools and a governance posture you need on the record, start at the AI front door instead. The Secure AI Use Review is the deliberate crossover point, so wherever you start, you can reach it.
Most companies your size are one tested backup, one MFA gap, or one over-permissioned vendor away from a bad week. No pitch, just your top gaps and next three moves.